*Node data
ID, gender, role, betweenness
HOLLY female participant 78.33333588
BRAZEY female participant 0
CAROL female participant 1.333333373
PAM female participant 32.5
PAT female participant 39.5
JENNIE female participant 6.333333492
PAULINE female participant 12.5
ANN female participant 0.5
MICHAEL male participant 58.83333206
BILL male participant 0
LEE male participant 5
DON male participant 16.33333397
JOHN male participant 0
HARRY male participant 2.333333254
GERY male instructor 54.66666794
STEVE male instructor 16.83333397
BERT male instructor 13.66666698
RUSS male instructor 47.33333206
*Node properties
ID x y color shape size shortlabel
HOLLY 1160 271 255 1 10 HOLLY
BRAZEY 1214 577 255 1 10 BRAZEY
CAROL 671 612 255 1 10 CAROL
PAM 985 127 255 1 10 PAM
PAT 802 402 255 1 10 PAT
JENNIE 729 187 255 1 10 JENNIE
PAULINE 69 590 255 1 10 PAULINE
ANN 877 818 255 1 10 ANN
MICHAEL 182 224 255 1 10 MICHAEL
BILL 380 137 255 1 10 BILL
LEE 617 44 255 1 10 LEE
DON 281 656 255 1 10 DON
JOHN 617 839 255 1 10 JOHN
HARRY 382 410 255 1 10 HARRY
GERY 1051 706 255 1 10 GERY
STEVE 64 394 255 1 10 STEVE
BERT 348 812 255 1 10 BERT
RUSS 1176 426 255 1 10 RUSS
*Tie data
from to friends strength
HOLLY PAM 1 1
PAT HOLLY 1 2
PAULINE PAT 1 2
JOHN RUSS 1 3
HARRY HOLLY 1 2
HARRY MICHAEL 1 1
BERT RUSS 1 3
RUSS GERY 1 1
RUSS STEVE 1 3
RUSS BERT 1 2
HOLLY BRAZEY 0 7
HOLLY CAROL 0 17
BRAZEY PAULINE 0 7
BRAZEY ANN 0 6
BRAZEY MICHAEL 0 15
PAM MICHAEL 0 9
PAM BILL 0 16
PAM LEE 0 13
JENNIE BRAZEY 0 8
PAULINE JENNIE 0 5
PAULINE ANN 0 4
ANN PAT 0 7
ANN MICHAEL 0 9
BILL LEE 0 10
DON ANN 0 12
quarta-feira, 22 de abril de 2009
arquitetura de movimentos
essa veio das antigas... mas ainda vale!
tem alguns princípios aqui que contam muito e podem fazer a diferença na prática!
terça-feira, 21 de abril de 2009
Serendipidade
O cientista francês Louis Pasteur dizia: “O acaso só favorece a mente preparada”.
Serendipidade, também conhecido como Serendipismo, Serendiptismo ou ainda Serendipitia, é um neologismo que se refere às descobertas afortunadas feitas, aparentemente, por acaso.
A história da ciência está repleta de casos que podem ser classificados como serendipismo. O conceito original de serendipismo foi muito usado, em sua origem. Nos dias de hoje, é considerado como uma forma especial de criatividade, ou uma das muitas técnicas de desenvolvimento do potencial criativo de uma pessoa adulta, que alia perseverança, inteligência e senso de observação.
Da wikipedia!
Serendipidade, também conhecido como Serendipismo, Serendiptismo ou ainda Serendipitia, é um neologismo que se refere às descobertas afortunadas feitas, aparentemente, por acaso.
A história da ciência está repleta de casos que podem ser classificados como serendipismo. O conceito original de serendipismo foi muito usado, em sua origem. Nos dias de hoje, é considerado como uma forma especial de criatividade, ou uma das muitas técnicas de desenvolvimento do potencial criativo de uma pessoa adulta, que alia perseverança, inteligência e senso de observação.
Da wikipedia!
São Beda
São Beda, um grande santo historiador anglosaxão do século VII, contava que há três caminhos para a infelicidade: “o primeiro é não ensinar o que se sabe, o segundo é não praticar o que se ensina e o terceiro é não perguntar o que se ignora”.
Brincando de blogar...
Dia de feriado. Tiradentes.
Tempo para pensar no por que e como blogar.
Achei um video interessante que ilustra um pouco o conceito....
Tempo para pensar no por que e como blogar.
Achei um video interessante que ilustra um pouco o conceito....
quarta-feira, 15 de abril de 2009
E mais uma vez o Memex....
na época do meu mestrado, um dos temas que gostei mais de estudar foi esse artigo do Bush e suas idéias sobre o Memex. No começo do Metáfora, foi uma das coisas que curti muito compartilhar por lá. O artigo apareceu de novo no começo do doutorado e aqui segue um resuminho dele. Bons ventos....
terça-feira, 7 de abril de 2009
budismo online
a mensagem que colocamos embaixo de nosso avatar no gtalk sempre foi algo que considerei uma grande sacada. diz muito, de forma simples, direta, pratica. da para sacar muita coisa ali e abrir caminhos para conversas, ideiais, sensacoes. uma forma a mais de nos conhecermos e um convite a mais para nos linkarmos.
hoje, refletindo sobre a morte a partir de uma boa proximidade com ela, mudei minha mensagem para:
"praticar o agora"
A Helo Campos me chamou para me indicar algumas leituras relacionadas. Gostei muito. De fora para dentro. Do macro ao micro. Dos links aos neuronios e a consciencia.
Seguem as dicas:
CAMINHOS PARA A PAZ INTERIOR
APRENDENDO A LIDAR COM A RAIVA
VENTOS DA IMPERMANENCIA
Vale conferir!
hoje, refletindo sobre a morte a partir de uma boa proximidade com ela, mudei minha mensagem para:
"praticar o agora"
A Helo Campos me chamou para me indicar algumas leituras relacionadas. Gostei muito. De fora para dentro. Do macro ao micro. Dos links aos neuronios e a consciencia.
Seguem as dicas:
CAMINHOS PARA A PAZ INTERIOR
APRENDENDO A LIDAR COM A RAIVA
VENTOS DA IMPERMANENCIA
Vale conferir!
na rede eu enredo
no gtalk, na rede humaniza sus:
a rede te forma quando vc. informa
a rede te constroi quando vc. constroi o link
o link te refaz quando faz a ponte
a ponte eh o meio
o link eh caminho
o caminho eh a ponte
que te forma
e forma e forma o todo
a rede te forma quando vc. informa
a rede te constroi quando vc. constroi o link
o link te refaz quando faz a ponte
a ponte eh o meio
o link eh caminho
o caminho eh a ponte
que te forma
e forma e forma o todo
segunda-feira, 6 de abril de 2009
A geração Facebook....
Caiu aqui na rede um artigo que conta um pouco o que a geração Facebook/Orkut está fazendo em comparação com a geração Fortune 500 (Big empresas). Alguns princípios interessantes parecem destacar novas formas, maneiras de atuar.
A questão que considero interessante desse tipo de artigo é apenas como os caras organizam e dão destaque ao que consideram como mudanças. No fundo, eu acredito que a rede está nos reescrevendo enquanto experiência de socialização. Ela reflete no macro uma mudança significativa no micro. Nas nossas redes neurais, nos circuitos que ativamos e reativamos. Será?
Veio daqui: Gary Hamel.
1. All ideas compete on an equal footing.
On the Web, every idea has the chance to gain a following—or not, and no one has the power to kill off a subversive idea or squelch an embarrassing debate. Ideas gain traction based on their perceived merits, rather than on the political power of their sponsors.
2. Contribution counts for more than credentials.
When you post a video to YouTube, no one asks you if you went to film school. When you write a blog, no one cares whether you have a journalism degree. Position, title, and academic degrees—none of the usual status differentiators carry much weight online. On the Web, what counts is not your resume, but what you can contribute.
3. Hierarchies are natural, not prescribed.
In any Web forum there are some individuals who command more respect and attention than others—and have more influence as a consequence. Critically, though, these individuals haven’t been appointed by some superior authority. Instead, their clout reflects the freely given approbation of their peers. On the Web, authority trickles up, not down.
4. Leaders serve rather than preside.
On the Web, every leader is a servant leader; no one has the power to command or sanction. Credible arguments, demonstrated expertise and selfless behavior are the only levers for getting things done through other people. Forget this online, and your followers will soon abandon you.
5. Tasks are chosen, not assigned.
The Web is an opt-in economy. Whether contributing to a blog, working on an open source project, or sharing advice in a forum, people choose to work on the things that interest them. Everyone is an independent contractor, and everyone scratches their own itch.
6. Groups are self-defining and -organizing.
On the Web, you get to choose your compatriots. In any online community, you have the freedom to link up with some individuals and ignore the rest, to share deeply with some folks and not at all with others. Just as no one can assign you a boring task, no can force you to work with dim-witted colleagues.
7. Resources get attracted, not allocated.
In large organizations, resources get allocated top-down, in a politicized, Soviet-style budget wrangle. On the Web, human effort flows towards ideas and projects that are attractive (and fun), and away from those that aren’t. In this sense, the Web is a market economy where millions of individuals get to decide, moment by moment, how to spend the precious currency of their time and attention.
8. Power comes from sharing information, not hoarding it.
The Web is also a gift economy. To gain influence and status, you have to give away your expertise and content. And you must do it quickly; if you don’t, someone else will beat you to the punch—and garner the credit that might have been yours. Online, there are a lot of incentives to share, and few incentives to hoard.
9. Opinions compound and decisions are peer-reviewed.
On the Internet, truly smart ideas rapidly gain a following no matter how disruptive they may be. The Web is a near-perfect medium for aggregating the wisdom of the crowd—whether in formally organized opinion markets or in casual discussion groups. And once aggregated, the voice of the masses can be used as a battering ram to challenge the entrenched interests of institutions in the offline world.
10. Users can veto most policy decisions.
As many Internet moguls have learned to their sorrow, online users are opinionated and vociferous—and will quickly attack any decision or policy change that seems contrary to the community’s interests. The only way to keep users loyal is to give them a substantial say in key decisions. You may have built the community, but the users really own it.
11. Intrinsic rewards matter most.
The web is a testament to the power of intrinsic rewards. Think of all the articles contributed to Wikipedia, all the open source software created, all the advice freely given—add up the hours of volunteer time and it’s obvious that human beings will give generously of themselves when they’re given the chance to contribute to something they actually care about. Money’s great, but so is recognition and the joy of accomplishment.
12. Hackers are heroes.
Large organizations tend to make life uncomfortable for activists and rabble-rousers—however constructive they may be. In contrast, online communities frequently embrace those with strong anti-authoritarian views. On the Web, muckraking malcontents are frequently celebrated as champions of the Internet’s democratic values—particularly if they’ve managed to hack a piece of code that has been interfering with what others regard as their inalienable digital rights.
A questão que considero interessante desse tipo de artigo é apenas como os caras organizam e dão destaque ao que consideram como mudanças. No fundo, eu acredito que a rede está nos reescrevendo enquanto experiência de socialização. Ela reflete no macro uma mudança significativa no micro. Nas nossas redes neurais, nos circuitos que ativamos e reativamos. Será?
Veio daqui: Gary Hamel.
1. All ideas compete on an equal footing.
On the Web, every idea has the chance to gain a following—or not, and no one has the power to kill off a subversive idea or squelch an embarrassing debate. Ideas gain traction based on their perceived merits, rather than on the political power of their sponsors.
2. Contribution counts for more than credentials.
When you post a video to YouTube, no one asks you if you went to film school. When you write a blog, no one cares whether you have a journalism degree. Position, title, and academic degrees—none of the usual status differentiators carry much weight online. On the Web, what counts is not your resume, but what you can contribute.
3. Hierarchies are natural, not prescribed.
In any Web forum there are some individuals who command more respect and attention than others—and have more influence as a consequence. Critically, though, these individuals haven’t been appointed by some superior authority. Instead, their clout reflects the freely given approbation of their peers. On the Web, authority trickles up, not down.
4. Leaders serve rather than preside.
On the Web, every leader is a servant leader; no one has the power to command or sanction. Credible arguments, demonstrated expertise and selfless behavior are the only levers for getting things done through other people. Forget this online, and your followers will soon abandon you.
5. Tasks are chosen, not assigned.
The Web is an opt-in economy. Whether contributing to a blog, working on an open source project, or sharing advice in a forum, people choose to work on the things that interest them. Everyone is an independent contractor, and everyone scratches their own itch.
6. Groups are self-defining and -organizing.
On the Web, you get to choose your compatriots. In any online community, you have the freedom to link up with some individuals and ignore the rest, to share deeply with some folks and not at all with others. Just as no one can assign you a boring task, no can force you to work with dim-witted colleagues.
7. Resources get attracted, not allocated.
In large organizations, resources get allocated top-down, in a politicized, Soviet-style budget wrangle. On the Web, human effort flows towards ideas and projects that are attractive (and fun), and away from those that aren’t. In this sense, the Web is a market economy where millions of individuals get to decide, moment by moment, how to spend the precious currency of their time and attention.
8. Power comes from sharing information, not hoarding it.
The Web is also a gift economy. To gain influence and status, you have to give away your expertise and content. And you must do it quickly; if you don’t, someone else will beat you to the punch—and garner the credit that might have been yours. Online, there are a lot of incentives to share, and few incentives to hoard.
9. Opinions compound and decisions are peer-reviewed.
On the Internet, truly smart ideas rapidly gain a following no matter how disruptive they may be. The Web is a near-perfect medium for aggregating the wisdom of the crowd—whether in formally organized opinion markets or in casual discussion groups. And once aggregated, the voice of the masses can be used as a battering ram to challenge the entrenched interests of institutions in the offline world.
10. Users can veto most policy decisions.
As many Internet moguls have learned to their sorrow, online users are opinionated and vociferous—and will quickly attack any decision or policy change that seems contrary to the community’s interests. The only way to keep users loyal is to give them a substantial say in key decisions. You may have built the community, but the users really own it.
11. Intrinsic rewards matter most.
The web is a testament to the power of intrinsic rewards. Think of all the articles contributed to Wikipedia, all the open source software created, all the advice freely given—add up the hours of volunteer time and it’s obvious that human beings will give generously of themselves when they’re given the chance to contribute to something they actually care about. Money’s great, but so is recognition and the joy of accomplishment.
12. Hackers are heroes.
Large organizations tend to make life uncomfortable for activists and rabble-rousers—however constructive they may be. In contrast, online communities frequently embrace those with strong anti-authoritarian views. On the Web, muckraking malcontents are frequently celebrated as champions of the Internet’s democratic values—particularly if they’ve managed to hack a piece of code that has been interfering with what others regard as their inalienable digital rights.
domingo, 5 de abril de 2009
Assinar:
Postagens (Atom)